The online short video sharing platform TikTok has suspended the accounts of a popular group called “Team 07” for posting a video speaking out against the mob lynching of Muslim youth Tabrez Ansari in Jharkhand. TikTok’s action follows a police complaint filed against the group by Shiv Sena IT cell chief Ramesh Solanki.
The members of the group — Faisal Shaikh, Hasnain Khan, Faiz Baloch, Adnan Shaikh and Sadhan Faroqui – uploaded a video, in which they are seen enacting a message that says, “Innocent Tabrez was killed, but if Tabrez’s son grows up and takes revenge then Muslims shouldn’t be termed as terrorists.”
This is the video due to which #team07 accounts got banned.
Justice for Tabraez Ansari and Team 07.. pic.twitter.com/NsUL0zUJC0— Umereee (@Saein_g) July 10, 2019
24-year-old Tabrez Ansari was lynched by a terrorist mob in Jharkhand’s Seraikela Kharswan district on June 18. According to a video widely shared on social media, the mob had tied to a pole and forced him to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’ and ‘Jai Hanuman’. Tabrez succumbed to injuries four days later.
The complainant Ramesh Solanki has mentioned that the video uploaded is divisive, inflammatory and incitement to violence.
Filed complaint against @mr_faisu_07 n his gang with @CMOMaharashtra @CPMumbaiPolice @MumbaiPolice for inciting people n justifying violence,terrorism
Hope to see action soon @narendramodi @AmitShah @AUThackeray @ippatel @ShefVaidya @SureshChavhanke @UnSubtleDesi @TajinderBagga pic.twitter.com/QZhSjqaE1x— Ramesh Solanki (@Rajput_Ramesh) July 8, 2019
“The video in question, which has violated our Community Guidelines, is no longer available on TikTok. Such irresponsible acts will not be tolerated on our platform, hence we have suspended three user accounts and are cooperating with law enforcement agencies,” TikTok said in a statement.
The three user accounts that have been removed belong to Hasnain Khan, Faisal Shaikh and Sadhan Faroqui.
The video, which soon went viral on different social media platforms has divided the internet, while some criticising it for allegedly creating hatred and animosity, while others supporting the group for speaking out against lynchings that have torn apart the social fabric of the country.
Mob who are involved in lynching, what action has taken over them?
But people’s who raised there voice against this mob lynching are being trolled.
Mob lynching is the mother of giving birth to violence.
stop mob lynching to anyone and there will be no violence.#team07 pic.twitter.com/Y8HR98tXHe— नाम नीचे लिखा है (@Aquibasnavi) July 10, 2019
Don’t spoil their future. Please forgive them. Maaf kr do. Bache h maafi b mangi h unhone🙏 #Faisu #Team07 I know the video was wrong bt they are immature nd did that mistake unintentionally. I hope u all understand
— Pooja Shetty (@Poojashetty_12) July 9, 2019
@tiktok_us
Just bring them back please
.#Team07 pic.twitter.com/PmFFxjaXmY— Beat Zero (@BeatZero4) July 10, 2019
AIMIM MLA from Mumbai’s Byculla, Waris Pathan also came out in support of the group. In an interview, he said that the constitution of the country gives freedom of speech for everyone to express their thoughts, and that’s what the group did. “Are we not even allowed to talk against the lynchings that are happening in the country?” he asked.
Actor Ajaz Khan lashed out at Shiv Sena’s Ramesh Solanki for filing a complaint and said that the group is made up of young people, who are only eking out a living by making videos, and that there is nothing wrong in what they said.
‘Team 07’ comprises of some of the biggest Tiktok celebrities in the country, where Faisal who goes with the name Mr Faisu has a following over 24 million. The group has a combined following of over 4 crore people.
19 CLUB LOGIN
May 3, 2025 at 2:58 PM
This is such a complex issue. While freedom of speech is important, it becomes problematic when it crosses into hate speech. The video seems to have crossed that line, and it’s good to see platforms like TikTok taking action. We need to find a balance between expression and respecting the dignity of others.
jayaSlot
May 5, 2025 at 7:51 PM
This is such a thought-provoking post. The line between hate speech and freedom of speech is becoming increasingly blurred, especially in the age of social media. It’s troubling to see how some content can incite violence while others are deemed just expression. TikTok’s decision to suspend accounts raises important questions about accountability and the responsibilities of platforms in regulating content.
V3 Game
May 7, 2025 at 4:54 AM
This is a complex issue that raises significant questions about the balance between freedom of speech and the responsibility to prevent hate speech. While I believe in the importance of open dialogue, the exploitation of sensitive topics like lynching for views is deeply troubling. TikTok’s decision to suspend accounts is a necessary step to protect the dignity of victims and their families. We need to draw a line where our right to express opinions doesn’t harm others or glorify violence.
1xbetapk Connect
May 16, 2025 at 12:46 PM
This situation highlights the fine line between freedom of speech and the responsibility that comes with it. While it’s important to discuss sensitive issues like the lynching of Tabrez Ansari, using a platform like TikTok for such content can easily cross into hate speech territory. It’s crucial for social media platforms to enforce guidelines that protect individuals from harm while also allowing for necessary discussions around social justice.
REJEKIBET APK
May 17, 2025 at 1:13 AM
This raises such important questions about the boundaries between hate speech and freedom of expression. It’s concerning to see how platforms like TikTok navigate these sensitive issues. While accountability is crucial, restricting voices can also lead to a dangerous precedent. Where do we draw the line?
wealth dt6 game
May 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM
This situation raises critical questions about the balance between freedom of speech and the responsibility of platforms to prevent hate speech. It’s disheartening to see such sensitive topics being exploited for views rather than fostering meaningful dialogue. While I value free expression, there’s a fine line that should not be crossed. TikTok’s decision seems justified if it helps curb harmful narratives and protect the dignity of victims and their families.
49 lottery login
May 26, 2025 at 10:16 PM
This situation raises important questions about the boundaries of free speech and the responsibility of platforms like TikTok to curb hate speech. While it’s essential to protect free expression, glorifying or trivializing acts of violence is unacceptable. I commend TikTok for taking a stand against content that promotes hate, but it’s also crucial to have clear guidelines that distinguish between artistic expression and harmful rhetoric.