Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


‘Insidious Attempt To Vilify Muslims’: SC Stops Sudarshan News From Airing ‘UPSC Jihad’ Show

Supreme Court has restrained Sudarshan News from telecasting the remaining episodes of the channel’s show that claimed to unveil an alleged conspiracy behind how “Muslims have infiltrated the civil services”. The court pointed out that the programme was “insidious” and was telecast with the intent and purpose of vilifying Muslims.

“You cannot target one community and brand them in a particular manner,” the top court said, restraining Sudarshan TV from airing its show “Bindas Bol” with seven of nine episodes left.

“It appears that the object of the programme is to vilify the Muslim community and make it responsible for an insidious attempt to infiltrate the civil services,” said a three-judge bench, calling the show “rabid”.

“The anchor’s grievance is that a particular group is gaining entry into the civil services,” said Justice DY Chandrachud, referring to the Sudarshan TV show. “How insidious is this? Such insidious charges put a question mark on UPSC exams, cast aspersion on UPSC. Such allegations without factual basis, how can this be allowed? Can such programmes be allowed in a free society,” he questioned.

In the teaser, channel head Suresh Chavhanke had claimed that the show would unveil the ‘conspiracy to infiltrate Muslims in government service’. On September 11, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had allowed the show to be telecast. On the same day, the Delhi high court had declined to stay the telecast, after initially having stopped the channel from airing the programme.
Senior advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for Sudarshan TV, told the bench that the channel considered it “an investigative story on national security.”

“Your client is doing a disservice to the nation and is not accepting India is a melting point of diverse culture. Your client needs to exercise his freedom with caution,” the bench told Divan.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The power of the electronic media to target a community, damage reputations or tarnish someone’s image is huge, the Supreme Court noted. “Reputations can be damaged; image can be tarnished. How to control this? The state cannot do this,” Justice Chandrachud remarked, saying it would be difficult for any government to regulate private channels.

“When journalists operate, they need to work around right to fair comment. See in criminal investigations, the media often focuses only one part of the investigation,” Justice Chandrachud added. “Now an anchor is targeting one community. To say we are a democracy we need to have certain standards in place.”

Written By

Rushda Fathima Khan is the Staff Reporter for The Cognate.

You May Also Like


A recent report of Human Rights Watch (HRW) has alleged that the Indian government is using its law and policies to systematically discriminate against...


Dalits converting to Islam or Christianity will be refrained from contesting elections from constituencies reserved for Scheduled Castes (SC), Minister of Law and Justice...


Of the total 4,78,600 prison inmates in the country, 3,15,409 or 65.90 per cent belong to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and the Other...


There is a lot to learn from the farewell speech of Congress veteran, Ghulam Nabi Azad. There is also a lot to unlearn from...